Zogby Report Breakdown: Analyzing the Debate Between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

In a recent discussion on The Zogby Report: Real and Unscripted, John and Jeremy Zogby reflected on a pivotal presidential debate. John Zogby began by recognizing Kamala Harris’ strong stage presence, noting her calm and confident demeanor. However, he pointed out that she avoided answering key questions about the economy and fracking, an issue particularly significant to Pennsylvania voters. Despite her poise, her shift on these topics Justify room for improvement.

John highlighted Harris’ use of a prosecutorial approach to deliver sharp critiques of Trump but observed that she didn’t deliver any defining moments. Meanwhile, Trump appeared confrontational throughout the debate, frequently frowning. Although he had some impactful lines, such as questioning Harris on her record, some of his more exaggerated statements were debunked during the debate.

Jeremy Zogby offered a broader analysis, viewing the two candidates as symbols of the deep political divide within the country. He emphasized how both candidates represented distinct and polarizing visions of America. Both Zogbys agreed that the debate didn’t lead to any major campaign shifts, although Harris might have gained a slight advantage.

They concluded that the race remains highly competitive, with neither candidate securing a clear victory. As the election continues, they expect the contest to become even tighter, mirroring the intense political and cultural divisions among voters.

John Zogby and Jeremy continue to be prominent voices in the field of political polling and research through their online focus groups and opinion survey company, John Zogby Strategies. Jeremy’s recent work, including polls at Robert F. Kennedy’s campaign events and research on how Americans view heroism during the pandemic, has garnered significant media coverage, including a feature in The New Yorker.